The findings suggest that while it is unlikely lamrim as a formal system originated in Muara Jambi, the formative influence of Atiśa's training in the region, particularly under the guru Serlingpa (Dharmakīrti), was deeply significant. The most defensible conclusion is that the roots of what would later become the lamrim tradition were nourished in the spiritual environment of Muara Jambi, contributing a crucial bodhicitta-centered orientation to Atiśa's later synthesis.


Atiśa's Formative Years in Suvarnadvipa

The traditional Tibetan biographies of Atiśa consistently highlight his twelve-year sojourn in Suvarnadvipa, the "Golden Isle," which is widely identified as part of the Srivijaya Empire in present-day Sumatra, Indonesia. This period was not a minor episode; it was a decisive phase of his spiritual formation. Atiśa, already a great scholar in India, traveled to Srivijaya specifically to study under the renowned master Serlingpa, also known as Suvarnadvipi Dharmakīrti, a teacher celebrated for his expertise in bodhicitta.



Sources recount that Atiśa, at the age of 31, made a perilous sea journey to Sumatra for this purpose, demonstrating the immense value placed on this teacher and the teachings he held. He remained in Srivijaya for approximately twelve years, from 1012 to 1025 CE, studying primarily with Serlingpa. This intensive training centered on the cultivation of bodhicitta, the altruistic resolve to achieve awakening for the benefit of all beings, a principle that would become the very heart of Atiśa's later teachings.


Muara Jambi as a Center of Buddhist Learning

The hypothesis that Atiśa's roots in Srivijaya were formative is further supported by evidence of the region's status as a major center of Buddhist learning. The Muara Jambi temple complex, located along the Batanghari River in present-day Jambi province, is now recognized as the largest and one of the oldest Buddhist heritage sites in Southeast Asia, covering approximately 3,981 hectares.

Archaeological evidence and carbon dating reveal that this complex was actively utilized from the 7th to the 13th century, making it contemporaneous with Atiśa's visit. Scholars have drawn striking parallels between the design and layout of Muara Jambi and Nalanda, the great Mahayana Buddhist monastic university in India, suggesting Muara Jambi served as a significant center for Buddhist learning and spiritual practice.

The curriculum at these Srivijayan institutions included Sanskrit grammar, logic, and Abhidharma philosophy, attracting students from China, India, and Tibet, creating a sophisticated intellectual environment. This is further evidenced by the writings of the Chinese pilgrim Yijing, who visited the region in the 7th century and described a fortified city with over a thousand monks studying all the subjects taught at Nalanda.

Therefore, when Atiśa traveled to Sumatra, he was entering a well established Buddhist world, not a peripheral one. The leading contender for the location of this great learning center is Muara Jambi, making it the most likely site where Atiśa studied under Serlingpa.


The Bodhipathapradipa: A Synthesis of Influences

Atiśa's seminal text, the Bodhipathapradipa ("Lamp for the Path to Awakening"), is the direct precursor to the later lamrim tradition. Composed in Tibet at the request of King Jangchub Ö, it presents a concise, systematic map of the entire Buddhist path, structured around practitioners of three capacities.

The question of influence centers on this text. The strongest line of potential influence from Muara Jambi lies not in the text's overall graded structure, which is deeply rooted in Indian Mahayana scholasticism, but in its profound emphasis on bodhicitta. Atiśa's training under Serlingpa is traditionally understood to have been a masterclass in mind training (lojong) and the practice of tonglen (giving and taking), methods for developing bodhicitta by training the mind to exchange oneself for others.

This practical, heart-centered cultivation of compassion is what distinguishes the Bodhipathapradipa. It is not a dry scholastic treatise but a guide for spiritual transformation, structured by motivation and culminating in the bodhisattva ideal.

As the evidence suggests, the most convincing historical picture is that India provided Atiśa with the great library of doctrinal and philosophical knowledge, while Muara Jambi deepened the great heart of compassionate practice. The Bodhipathapradipa reflects a "strongly embodied bodhicitta orientation" that likely owes much to his training under Serlingpa.

The text was so influential in Tibet that it inspired numerous commentaries and became the foundation for the Kadam tradition and, later, Tsongkhapa's monumental lamrim Chenmo.


The Challenge of Proving "Origin in Muara Jambi"

While the influence is plausible, proving that lamrim itself "originated in Muara Jambi" is far more challenging. The primary difficulty is that while the connection is strong, it is not definitively proven. Although Muara Jambi is a strong contender for the center where Atiśa studied, and its design and scale mirror that of Nalanda, direct epigraphic evidence explicitly naming Muara Jambi as the site of Atiśa's studies has not yet been uncovered.

As one scholar notes, archaeologists are still cautious about calling it a 'university' due to the current lack of written documents, though the physical evidence strongly supports this interpretation.

A second difficulty is that while influence can be argued, textual origin is harder to demonstrate. The Bodhipathapradipa is clearly a synthesis of Indian Mahayana sources. To prove a direct Muara Jambi textual influence, one would need to identify a specific structural element or teaching not found in the Indian sources Atiśa knew. This evidence is currently lacking.

Therefore, a balanced historical formulation is necessary: The Southeast Asian, likely Muara Jambi phase of Atiśa's education likely contributed significantly to the bodhicitta-centered orientation that later became foundational in the lamrim tradition. It is therefore more accurate to speak of a "formative influence on an important root" rather than a single point of origin.


Conclusion

In conclusion, the research supports the hypothesis that some important roots of the lamrim tradition were nourished in the Buddhist learning center of Muara Jambi. The evidence for Atiśa's twelve-year, deeply formative training under Serlingpa at this site is robust and consistent across traditional biographies and modern scholarship.

This training, which centered on the cultivation of bodhicitta, profoundly shaped Atiśa's spiritual outlook and is arguably reflected in the heart-centered emphasis of his Bodhipathapradipa. While it is improbable that Muara Jambi was the place where lamrim itself was first composed or taught, the region likely served as a critical site for developing the core compassionate motivation that defines the tradition.

The most defensible claim is that "one spiritual seed of lamrim was planted during Atiśa's residence in the Buddhist center of Muara Jambi," making this a crucial chapter in the tradition's rich and complex history.


References

Atiśa Dīpaṃkara Śrījñāna. *Bodhipathapradīpa (Lamp for the Path to Enlightenment)*. Sanskrit Text and Translation: Atiśa. *Bodhipathapradipah*. Varanasi: Kendriya Ucca Tibbati-Siksha-Samsthana, 1984.

*bKa' gdams Glegs bam: Collected Teachings and Stories of Lord Atisha and his Disciple on the Practice of bKa' gdams pa Buddhism*. 2 vols. Varanasi, 1973-74.

Boechari. "Ritual Deposits of Candi Gumpung (Muaro Jambi)." SPAFA Report, Consultative Workshop on Archeological and Environmental Studies on Srivijaya, Bangkok, 1985.

Chatterji, B. R. "Journal of Atisa in Serling and Tholing." *Bulletin of Tibetology* 3, no. 3-4 (1966).

Eimer, Helmut. *Berichte über das Leben des Atiša (Dīpaṃkaraśrījñāna), Eine Untersuchung der Quellen*. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1977.

Eimer, Helmut. *rNam thar rgyas pa: Materialien zu einer Biographie des Atiša (Dīpaṃkaraśrījñāna)*. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1979.

Ferrari, Alfonsa. *mK'yen brts's Guide to the Holy Places of Central Tibet*. Roma: Instituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente, 1958.

Gurugana, Dharmakaranama. *Biography of Atisha*. Bangkok: Social Science Association, 1974.

Jinpa, Thupten. *Mind Training: The Great Collection*. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2006.

Liu, Kuo-wei. "Analysis on Tibetan Textual Sources regarding Atiśa's (982-1054) Travel to Sumatra." Paper presented at *Śrīvijaya in Southeast Asia and South Asia Regional Context*, 2014.

Nihom, M. "The Mandala of Candi Gumpung and the Indo-Tibetan Vajrasekharatantra." *Indo-Iranian Journal* 41, no. 3 (1998).

Pabongka Rinpoche. *Liberation in the Palm of Your Hand*. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1991.

Skilling, Peter. "Dharmakirti's Durbodhaloka and the Literature of Srivijaya." *Journal of the Siam Society* 85, no. 1/2 (1997): 185–94.

Sopa, Geshe Lhundub. *Steps on the Path to Enlightenment*. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2004.

Tjoa-Bonatz, Mai Lin, J. David Neidel, and Agus Widiatmoko. "Early Architectural Images from Muara Jambi on Sumatra, Indonesia." *Asian Perspectives* 48, no. 1 (2009): 32-55.

Tsadra Foundation. "Suvarṇadvīpa Dharmakīrti." *Tsadra Commons*. Accessed 6 January 2026.

University of San Diego Faculty Publication. "The Life and Legacy of Atiśa Dīpaṃkara Śrījñāna." University of San Diego.

[This paper concludes: "Most significantly, perhaps, it brings to light the hypothesis that Muara Jambi was indeed the site where Atisha traveled and remained for twelve years, studying under the renowned teacher Serlingpa Dharmakirti. From Sumatra, Atisha took the precious teachings he received, including the teachings on bodhicitta, to Tibet."]